-
April 8th, 2005, 11:13 AM
#61
Inactive Member
To answer this thread's originally posed question, inside sources suggest Warner's new Superman movie is being shot 90% HD (Panavision Genesis no less), 10% film (for high speed as the Genesis is only 30fps and, ironically, effects work).
While I'm all for the technology, the director and his choice of DP for the project (Brian Singer and NT Sigel) are just plain wrong and the film is being made for all the wrong reasons- it also breaks the British patriotic paradoxical wonder of the original Superman movies, which were magnificently photographed in 2.35:1 animorphic by the UK's finest: Geoffrey (2001, Caberet) Unsworth, Robert (American Werewolf, Michael Jackson's Thriller) Paynter and Alan (Return of the Jedi, For Your Eyes Only) Hume. Okay, so the new film will obviously look better than the Cannon Group's Superman IV pathetically shot in flat light by Ernest Day, but even he was a Brit! [img]wink.gif[/img]
-
December 2nd, 2005, 03:41 PM
#62
Inactive Member
Now these were the fuckin' days.
As she used to say it all comes down to "talnet."
Another roaring exposure success story.
-
December 3rd, 2005, 04:43 AM
#63
Senior Hostboard Member
only 193 posts to go before you explode onto our local multiplex huh?
bring back N.Foster Tyler!
-
December 3rd, 2005, 09:37 AM
#64
Inactive Member
Zing! That served me right.
Here's a thought though. How many Irish filmmakers can you name?
[img]graemlins/thinking.gif[/img]
-
December 3rd, 2005, 09:47 AM
#65
Senior Hostboard Member
I've seen The Crying Game and Interview With the Vampire, but I see your point.
Whatchya gonna do without Film Four? Is your talnet up to the mark?!
-
December 12th, 2005, 09:36 PM
#66
Inactive Member
Honestly I don't know. When you get out of film school you're at the mercy of someone in power giving you a shot. I'm working really hard on my writing and although the demise of film four is lamentable I'm still hopeful.
An investor is willing to give me 40k for a feature in principle. I will not take that money untill i'm sure I won't let the guy down.
-
December 13th, 2005, 03:41 PM
#67
Inactive Member
Holy crap! This thread was started four and a half years ago!!! I remember it! [img]graemlins/cry.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/cry.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/cry.gif[/img]
-
December 19th, 2005, 12:06 AM
#68
Inactive Member
Oh wow I fought about this post.Hi From Brenda Diane Smith,A FILMMAKER TOO!!!
-
December 19th, 2005, 05:28 AM
#69
Inactive Member
Wow... i didn't expect you'd reply.
-
December 19th, 2005, 09:07 AM
#70
Inactive Member
Bloody hell...U-N-R-E-A-L!
K, I've got the humble pie heating in the microwave* waiting on the result of the following question:
So Brenda Diane Smith, how did your big movie work out?
* Actually its called a "Space Cube." It doesn't rotate. Think it might be a prototype or something. Looks like its from 1988.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks